🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.